MVB to John Quincy Adams, 28 September 1828

MVB to [John Quincy Adams], 28 September 1828

Washington

DSir

I have this moment read your note in relation to Genl Porters requests. I shall hereafter if it is deemed necessary make out a formal opinion upon the subject & will therefore content myself for the present with a brief sketch of my views in the matter. I am not satisfied by Genl Porters statement that the law in question is unconstitutional. I dissent from the opinion expressed by him that he is entitled to the larger salary after the expiration of the two years. The object of the act of 1821 was & its language is sufficient to effect it, to prohibit thereafter any further or other allowance than that which was provided by it & the only consequence of the continuance of the Commission beyond the two years & the Omission to extend the act can be that for the <residue> of the term the Commissioner is left to his application to Congress for further allowance. Much stress is laid by Genl Porter on the situation of Gov Van Ness, his acts & those of the government in regard to his claims. I would therefore suggest the propriety if its being stated by Mr <Anderson> in the letter to Genl Porter in which he communicates the opinion of the President, that Mr Van Ness was informed that this was not a case of that character in which the government could with propriety be asked to agree to an amicable suit, and that he had consented to waive his claims & have his account settled according to the law of 1821 & that unless Genl Porter consents to the same course the government must adopt such measures as are within its power to effect that result.

Very respectfully

Your. obed. Sevt

MVanBuren

Note: Because this document is only a verified first-pass transcription, it and the document metadata may still contain errors.